October 18, 2009
(left-click to load in browser; RECOMMEND right-click to download to your computer)
Requires FREE Acrobat Reader
20 pp.; 728 Kb
Exhibits A & 112
395 pp.; 15,231 Kb
from PART 1 above:
A (8 pages, 266 Kb)
(Chuck Damm to Coastal Commisioners,
November 19, 1987)
52 pp.; 1,720 Kb
207 pp.; 5,578 Kb
from PART 3 above:
14 (5 pages, 149
October 18, 2009
Subject: Newport Coast Drive Tolling. Not called out in the Irvine Coast Development Agreement County of Orange June 9,1988. Exhibit C "Irvine Coast Local Coastal Plan Findings Of Approval And Supporting Documents" WHY ARE THE CCC FINDINGS NOT BEING FOLLOWED? or enforced by the your good offices?
Dear MR. Douglas,
(Note the first version of this letter to you dated October 4, 2009 is amended in this revised request by dropping the wording --"under the "Public Records Act". as referred to in your denial letter of October 14, 2009 by MS. Jessica Reed. Senior Legal Analyst. )
I am asking you to reply to my letter's to you of November 3, 2008, as now posted on my web site and the later March 9, 2009 letter to you pleas find a copy of this letter enclosed.
In my letter to our Attorney General Edmund G. Brown, Jr. January 16, 2008 "Request for review of Opinion No. 931205 per information and documentation below". as found at www.newportcoastdrive.com [with my exhibits] Where I again make the point that the Road wright of way and the building of Newport Coast Drive from Pacific Coast Highway to MacArthur Boulevard was part of the Quid Pro Quo for a Coastal Development Permit, and called out in the "Exhibit C "Irvine Coast Local Coastal Plan Findings Of Approval And Supporting Documents"
The controlling argument for the original A. G. opinion of May 12, 1994. Should have been in following the callouts of: Exhibit C "Irvine Coast Local Coastal Plan Findings Of Approval And Supporting Documents. If not for a letter from Chuck Damm CCC. Long Beach letter, 1994; copied to me by Rodney Lilyquist A. G. office, wear MR. Damm makes this false statement of intent. "As I mentioned in our October 1st, letter . the portion of Newport Coast Drive where a toll is proposed is not in the Coastal Zone. As such. we cannot assert jurisdiction without a direct tie to the adopted provisions of either the Irvine Coast LCP and /or the coastal development permit. Our research shows no such tie" [my exhibit 11.]
I ask you and your good office, again to correct this false statement by MR. Damm to the Attorneys Generals office for his Opinion No. 93 - 1205. relying on my three exhibits below and other buttressing facts in my letter to the A. G. and site at. WWW.NEWPORTCOASTDRIVE.COM
[my exhibit 12] Memorandum December 4, 1987 To. Commissioners and interested Persons from Chuck Damm. Page 4, (see Exhibit 13 in the Executive Summary). [my exhibit 4] of the colored map road layout as proposed.
[my exhibit 13] CCC. Commissioners and Interested Persons. November 19, 1987. from Chuck Damm. Subject: County Of Orange Irvine Coast Segment Local Coastal Program (LCP) Land Use Plan Amendment. More detail of the road as mitigation Page 22. (see Exhibit 13 in the Executive Summary). [my exhibit 4] of the colored map road layout as proposed.
[my exhibit 1] Irvine Coast Development Agreement County Of Orange, June 9, 1988. Exhibit C "Irvine Coast Local Coastal Plan Findings Of Approval And Supporting Documents" Page 22. (see Exhibit 13 in the Executive Summary). [my exhibit 4] of the colored map road layout as proposed.
Respectfully watching for your reply as the public has paid over sixty six million dollars in Tolls for using what was given as LCP. free public road mitigation. I am specifically asking you that the: CEQA, EIR and LCP. Findings, specified be followed as originally called out in June, 1988.
Ronald Douglas Kennedy
4741 Sleeping Indian RD.